'웹3.0 이란?'에 해당되는 글 18건
- 2008/06/17
- 2008/05/27
- 2008/04/26
- 2008/04/25
- 2008/04/21
- 2008/04/21
- 2008/04/21
- 2008/04/20
- 2008/04/20
- 2008/04/20
The Rensselaer interactive debate on the future of the Web is just starting now and is being webcast live here (note: Silverlight required). You can watch the debate and submit questions - including while it is happening - by clicking here. Update: The debate is now over, see our comprehensive notes below...
Here's a screenshot from Tim Berners-Lee's opening presentation:

The first question is about the Semantic Web -- is it still just a dream? Nova Spivack of Twine says simply: yes! He says that the problem gets harder as more information comes on the web. You need to "disambiguate data". The AI approach puts burden on the software. The Semantic Web approach puts the burden on the data itself, so it's not about making smarter software - but smarter data.
He says there are technical and social challenges. Nova asks, rhetorically: is there an alternative to the Semantic Web, as the Web grows and scales? He says the HAL-9000 AI approach is an alternative, but it is not progressing much. Another solution is to "use the crowd", and he says while this approach shows promise, it doesn't scale to solve the problem. So both machine and human approaches won't scale -- hence the Semantic Web is the solution. He says "it's a huge cultural project" and is a long term goal.

Deborah McGuinness from Rensselaer introduces the debate, including a mention of ReadWriteWeb as part of the debate's "social media twist".
Nigel Shadbolt is a Professor of Artificial Intelligence and Deputy Head of the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton, UK. He kind of defends AI, although he says we can expect "a very different form of AI" to what has gotten most of the press thus far. He says that we can expect "augmented collective intelligence". He says "fragments of micro-intelligence" will evolve into an ecosystem, so AI will contribute to the future of the Web in that way.
The next question is about a multi-lingual Web. Wendy Hall is a Professor of Computer Science in the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton, UK. She talks about the Chinese Web, which has 5 billion pages that Google doesn't index. She says that soon the dominant language on the Web will be Chinese, and much of that data will be via mobile phones. She says that a lot of "key sites" in the english language Web are not accessible in China, so the role of government will in a big way determine what will happen. She says that educating government all over the world will be important. The Web is already fragmented, but the solution isn't to teach everyone english. So the Web Science Lab has been established in China and progress is being made there.
Nigel Shadbolt points out that different cultures frame information quite differently. So he says there must be multiple ways to represent content on the Web. Nova says that each culture has to map their content to a conceptual representation, and then globally we need to map different culture representations together.
Tim Berners-Lee says that sometimes that will work and sometimes it won't. He says "the diversity of culture is really important" and he lists a kind of gradation of content that we can understand -- e.g. 10% of Web content everybody can understand, x% we can't understand, etc.
A question from the audience about democracy. Wendy replies that the Web does have the potential to change the way we select politicians to represent us. So she says it's been interesting to watch the US presidential election - Obama has been using new technology and could bring young people into the process. So the Web brings a wider representation of people to be involved in democracy. She says it has the potential to "dramatically change" the way we select governments, mentioning the self-organizing of Wikipedia. "You can well imagine something which can shift what we do" in democracy.
Nigel chimes in that the Web can both mobilize democracy, but also there is danger of "cyber vigilantism". He mentions the dangers of a "rampant blogosphere".
Nova also mentions the "threat to democracy" of the Web - he says "freedom is actually at risk". He notes data logging and privacy issues. So he says it's too early to tell how the Web will affect democracy - he says the Web was built on trust, but that nowadays the Web is being mis-used in some ways. So we need to be worried about that - encryption, privacy, etc are things to look out for.
There is a question about ontologies, but (ironically) the answer got rather complicated and so I lost the thread :-)
Next an audience member asks: what's the difference between Web Science and Computer Science? Wendy replies that Web Science is inter-disciplinary and it's designed to get more people than just computer geeks into studying this domain.
The next, rather rambling, question from the audience is addressed to Nova and is about data. The question (when it eventually comes) is: what is the Semantic Web when it comes to different kinds of data (multi-modal, subtleties, nuances). Nova's first response to this involved question: whoa! He then says that we have to start with the simple cases. He talks about time and calendars, semantic representation of events, etc. But he says the Semantic Web won't capture the nuances of human interaction any time soon. He says "we're not trying to replace human intelligence", but "free up" human intelligence.
Nigel, coming from AI angle, says that behavior is a key part of the puzzle. He says understanding behavior, on a Web scale, is happening. He talks about sensors - where sensors report on data in our environment. 'Ambiently intelligent environments' is his term for this.
Tim's response: "an ontology does not represent the same thing as a haiku does." The audience laughs appreciatively. He interprets that as mening there are different languages for different things.
The next question talks about "an innovation in logic". For example "visual logics" will need innovation if the Web is to understand multi-modal information. Tim's response is that logic has given us formalized reasoning, but it doesn't describe how people think. So he doesn't believe we need to formalize some kind of data as logic (e.g. the way people dance).
Nova says that we don't have an equivalent of a functional MRI for the Web, in other words there aren't enough ways to measure things on the Web. He says you need sensors and math to do measurements, rather than logic.
The final question is about data: how do you validate it, and if it's to be shared, how to you manage privacy etc. Nigel points to Wikipedia as a way to validate information, self-correcting by people. Nova says reasoning is where the Semantic Web can help validate data, as well as the human self-correcting (e.g. wikipedia).
And that ends the debate. Feel free to contribute comments below!
Web 3.0 -- aka The Semantic Web -- is about enriching the connections of the Web. By enriching the connections within the Web, the entire Web may become smarter.
I believe that collective intelligence primarily comes from connections -- this is certainly the case in the brain where the number of connections between neurons far outnumbers the number of neurons; certainly there is more "intelligence" encoded in the brain's connections than in the neurons alone. There are several kinds of connections on the Web:
Are there other kinds of connections that I haven't listed -- please let me know!
I believe that the Semantic Web can actually enrich all of these types of connections, adding more semantics not only to the things being connected (such as representations of information or people or apps) but also to the connections themselves.
In the Semantic Web approach, connections are represented with statements of the form (subject, predicate, object) where the elements have URIs that connect them to various ontologies where their precise intended meaning can be defined. These simple statements are sometimes called "triples" because they have three elements. In fact, many of us are working with statements that have more than three elements ("tuples"), so that we can represent not only subject, predicate, object of statements, but also things like provenance (where did the data for the statement come from?), timestamp (when was the statement made), and other attributes. There really is no limit to what kind of metadata can be stored in these statements. It's a very simple, yet very flexible and extensible data model that can represent any kind of data structure.
The important point for this article however is that in this data model rather than there being just a single type of connection (as is the case on the present Web which basically just provides the HREF hotlink, which simply means "A and B are linked" and may carry minimal metadata in some cases), the Semantic Web enables an infinite range of arbitrarily defined connections to be used. The meaning of these connections can be very specific or very general.
For example one might define a type of connection called "friend of" or a type of connection called "employee of" -- these have very different meanings (different semantics) which can be made explicit and also machine-readable using OWL. By linking a page about a person with the "employee of" link to another page about a different person, we can express that one of them employs the other. That is a statement that any application which can read OWL is able to see and correctly interpret, by referencing the underlying definition of "employee of" which is defined in some ontology and might for example specify that an "employee of" relation connects a person to a person or organization who is their employer. In other words, rather than just linking things with the generic "hotlink" we are all used to, they can now be linked with specific kinds of links that have very particular and unambiguous meaning and logical implications.
This has the potential at least to dramatically enrich the information-carrying capacity of connections (links) on the Web. It means that connections can carry more meaning, on their own. It's a new place to put meaning in fact -- you can put meaning between things to express their relationships. And since connections (links) far outnumber objects (information, people or applications) on the Web, this means we can radically improve the semantics of the structure of the Web as a whole -- the Web can become more meaningful, literally. This makes a difference, even if all we do is just enrich connections between gross-level objects (in other words, connections between Web pages or data records, as opposed to connections between concepts expressed within them, such as for example, people and companies mentioned within a single document).
Even if the granularity of this improvement in connection technology is relatively gross level it could still be a major improvement to the Web. The long-term implications of this have hardly been imagined let alone understood -- it is analogous to upgrading the dendrites in the human brain; it could be a catalyst for new levels of computation and intelligence to emerge.
It is important to note that, as illustrated above, there are many types of connections that involve people. In other words the Semantic Web, and Web 3.0, are just as much about people as they are about other things. Rather than excluding people, they actually enrich their relationships to other things. The Semantic Web, should, among other things, enable dramatically better social networking and collaboration to take place on the Web. It is not only about enriching content.
Now where will all these rich semantic connections come from? That's the billion dollar question. Personally I think they will come from many places: from end-users as they find things, author content, bookmark content, share content and comment on content (just as hotlinks come from people today), as well as from applications which mine the Web and automatically create them. Note that even when Mining the Web a lot of the data actually still comes from people -- for example, mining the Wikipedia, or a social network yields lots of great data that was ultimately extracted from user-contributions. So mining and artificial intelligence does not always imply "replacing people" -- far from it! In fact, mining is often best applied as a means to effectively leverage the collective intelligence of millions of people.
These are subtle points that are very hard for non-specialists to see -- without actually working with the underlying technologies such as RDF and OWL they are basically impossible to see right now. But soon there will be a range of Semantically-powered end-user-facing apps that will demonstrate this quite obviously. Stay tuned!
Of course these are just my opinions from years of hands-on experience with this stuff, but you are free to disagree or add to what I'm saying. I think there is something big happening though. Upgrading the connections of the Web is bound to have a significant effect on how the Web functions. It may take a while for all this to unfold however. I think we need to think in decades about big changes of this nature.
What Web applications and trends will make it big in 2008? In this post the RWW authors ruminate on the current trends in Web technology and look forward to what 2008 might bring us. Topics include Google, semantic web, online advertising, recommendation systems, Facebook, digg, open standards, Mobile Web, search engines, and much more!
So check out our predictions for '08 and please contribute your own in the comments. Also you may want to review our track record for 2007 Web predictions.
Richard MacManus, Editor, ReadWriteWeb:
1. Semantic Apps will become popular in 2008, due to their ability to get better content results and make better data connections. Think search engines like Hakia and Powerset, wikipedia-like efforts like Twine and Freebase, and apps that use semantic technologies under the hood (such as AdaptiveBlue and Snap).
2. In tandem with #1, Google will experiment more with Semantic Apps in '08. The Knols project, although not overly semantic, is a hint of this direction.
3. Web Services platforms will be a fierce battleground in '08, with Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Mozilla and others competing to provide 'Web OS' and online storage to consumers. Unfortunately this may spell the end of a number of startups in this space.
4. Zoho and/or ThinkFree will be acquired by big companies wanting to leapfrog into the Web Office space.
5. The online advertising market will consolidate, after the spate of acquisitions in 2007. CPM will continue to dominate for media brands and CPC for niche sites, although there will be experimentation in VRM and other forms of highly specific targeting of ads. Privacy issues will prevent the latter from becoming mainstream though. The much-hyped CPA (Cost per Action) will continue to be a pipe dream, because publishers simply don't want it.
6. The big Internet companies will surprise us all by embracing open standards, and attempting to compete with each other with features instead of data lock-in (OK, this could just be wishful thinking!).
7. The most interesting innovations on the Web in 2008 won't happen in Silicon Valley, but in Asia (China, Japan, Korea). At least one startup from China will break through in the US market with Twitter-like success in 2008 - and it will almost certainly be a Mobile Web app.
Marshall Kirkpatrick, Lead Writer, ReadWriteWeb:
1. Twitter will be acquired.
2. Most ad networks will start producing their own content to advertise against; and some content companies today will get acquired by ad networks.
3. Online video will become so ubiquitous, including live and mobile, that everyone will wonder how the internet existed without it. It won't feel like a big deal, though.
4. A handful of big companies will let you start logging in with an OpenID associated with your account.
5. The value of recommendation engines will become all the more clear; the era of data will be celebrated.
6. People will rebel against Google, at least a little bit. Maybe.
7. People engaged in the new web will do some really awesome stuff that we'll all be in awe of.
Josh Catone, Lead Writer, ReadWriteWeb:
1. Tumblr will be acquired.
2. Privacy will be a growing concern in the mainstream, but ultimately people won't really take any action and for the most part, things won't change. Some companies and groups (think Mozilla) will push for better privacy controls for users, while others (think Facebook) will continue to push the envelope and continue down a slippery slope. Users will eventually push back, but I am hesitant to say that proverbial "straw that breaks the camel's back" will come in 2008.
3. OpenID will be adopted by more startups and larger web companies, but most people (mainstream users) still won't use it - that's a couple of years off.
4. Facebook will continue to grow and their platform will be adopted by other large social networks. Google will sweat.
5. Mobile web usage will be a big story in 2008. It's already big in many parts of the world; and Westerners are about to get hooked. With new mobile devices that makes web surfing less painful, people will be more and more connected away from their computers.
6. Mainstream media coverage will be a catalyst for the adoption of Web Office apps by consumers; and Microsoft will eventually be forced to change their Web Office strategy and offer a fully online office suite (but that latter won't happen in 2008). Offline mode (Gears, AIR, Silverlight, etc.) will be what really tips the scales and causes mainstream users to to embrace the as-of-yet unfamiliar world of Web Office applications.
Alex Iskold, Feature Writer, ReadWriteWeb:
1. 2008 will be slow and cautious, with the first half dominated by recession or fear of recession.
2. Facebook is going to see the same kind of decline in popularity in 2008 that MySpace saw in 2007.
3. Digg is going to be acquired by one of the mainstream media conglomerates.
4. Implicit applications, which monitor our habits and automatically infer our likes, will rise.
Emre Sokullu, Feature Writer, ReadWriteWeb
1. Facebook will acquire companies that do the following, in order to strengthen their advertising unit: personalization, behavior tracking, image recognition (Riya?)
2. Facebook will release a browser.
3. However, despite all that... Facebook will decline.
4. Google OpenSocial will be a failure; Google will try to create its own social networking empire by making acquisitions in this space.
5. Microsoft will become more aggresive and buy many popular companies at once (remember Ballmer's quote). Candidates include SixApart, Technorati.
Sean Ammirati, Editor, ReadWriteTalk (our podcast show):
1. Google will really start looking vulnerable in 2008. While the 'one trick pony' comment by Steve Ballmer drew sarcastic responses, this will begin to look prophetic. While they'll maintain market share in the search industry, the lack of traction in any other of their other initiatives will start to cause frustration. Plus, they will increasingly be perceived as the 'evil' company in many of these new initiatives.
2. Closely related, Yahoo's Hack strategy (see ReadWriteTalk's podcast with Bradley Horowitz) will start to bear fruit and things will look much more optimistic in Sunnyvale this year.
3. Facebook will start to feel pressure from two trends that will emerge on the web: distributed social networks and distributed commerce systems. For distributed commerce systems, look to see a first proof of concept from the VRM project. Chris Messina's diso project with Wordpress will be a great proof of concept for distributed social neworks.
4. Non-search advertising on the web will increase in value significantly. This will be done through a lot of innovation in the ad targeting systems (both behavioral and contextual) and new metrics being adopted by Madison Ave beyond CPC and CPM.
5. There will be a lot of innovation in the hyper-local space, putting the final nail in the newspaper industry's coffin. This will include companies like Outside.in and Yelp moving toward widespread use and new web properties (from both startups and big Internet Cos) emerging.
6. Finally, a 3G iPhone! OK, I don't know if this is a prediction, but I really really want it to be true :)
Charles Knight, Editor, AltSearchEngines (RWW network blog)
1. In the 1st Q 2008, the true "Google Killer" in search will be in Stealth Mode. In 2nd Q 2008 the first prototype will begin in closed Alpha mode. In 3rd Q 2008 it will be ready for the final closed Beta testing. In 4th Q 2008 it will launch and "Rock and Shock" the world!
2. The classic Vertical Search Engines (Job Search, Health, Consumer Electronics, Shopping, Video, People, more...) will continue their dominance over all other Search Engines in their various niches.
3. The Alternative Search Engines will pick up the pace of partnerships and cooperation, for their solid mutual benefit.
4. Mainstream Media interest in the Alts will increase until it begins to rival coverage of the five major search engines.
5. The trend towards 'widgetization' of the Alts will continue. Approximately 2 in 10 Alternative Search Engines (20%) have widgets now, and that number will double in 2008 to 4 in 10 or 40%.
Now it's time for you to tell us your Web predictions for 2008. Please leave a comment or trackback below!
Crystal Ball image by Blue Cubic Electron Syncrony, via Flickr
| 구글 흔들리고 지능형 웹 뜬다 | |||||||||
| 리드라이트웹이 전망하는 2008년 웹의 변화 | |||||||||
| |||||||||
리드라이트웹이 2008년 웹의 변화를 예측한 결과는 흥미롭다. 장황하지만 간단히 요약하고 해설을 덧붙인다 (원문 : http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web_predictions.php).
또한 시멘틱 웹도 인기를 끌 전망이다. Hakia나 Powerset, Twine, Freebase 같은 검색 엔진에 주목할 필요가 있다. 사용자들의 습관과 기호를 추측하고 모니터링해 최적의 검색 결과를 찾아주는 검색엔진이 나타날 것이고 데이터들 사이의 의미를 짚어내는 지능형 웹 프로그래밍이 활성화 될 것이다. 웹 오피스의 약진도 주목할 필요가 있다. 웹 오피스란 문서 편집이나 스프레드시트, 프레젠테이션 같은 소프트웨어를 별도의 응용 프로그램 설치 없이 웹에서 이용할 수 있는 서비스를 말한다. 씽크프리나 조호 같은 웹 오피스 서비스는 대형 인터넷 기업들에 인수합병될 가능성도 있다. 씽크프리는 우리나라 한글과컴퓨터에서 개발, 국내보다 해외에서 더 유명한 서비스다. 마이크로소프트 역시 웹으로 전환을 서두를 수밖에 없을 것이라는 전망도 있다. 실리콘밸리 뿐만 아니라 중국이나 일본, 한국에서 세계를 깜짝 놀라게 할 새로운 웹 서비스가 나타날 수도 있다. 중국에서 창업한 트위터 같은 서비스가 미국까지 치고 들어올 수도 있다. 인수합병도 활발해 질 것이다. 마이스페이스가 그랬듯이 페이스북도 쇠퇴할 것이라는 전망이 있는 한편, 지속적인 성장에 무게를 두는 전망도 있다. 구글 등에 인수합병 될 것이라는 전망도 있다. 마이크로소프트가 식스어파트나 테크노라티 등을 인수할 가능성도 있다. 딕닷컴 역시 인수합병 대상으로 거론되고 있다. 씽크프리나 조호 역시 매력적인 인수합병 대상이다. 한편, 데이터를 가둬두는 전통적인 웹 서비스는 도전을 받게 될 것이다. 오픈 스탠더드를 내세우면서 공격적으로 획기적인 서비스를 시도하는 새로운 사업모델이 나타날 것이다. 네이버처럼 폐쇄적인 데이터베이스를 운영하는 사이트는 딜레마에 직면하게 될 것이다. 지역에 기반한 언론이 성장할 것이다. Outside.in과 Yelp를 주목할 필요가 있다. 오픈 아이디를 도입하는 기업이 늘어나겠지만 큰 인기를 끌지는 못할 것으로 보인다. 오픈 아이디란 하나의 아이디로 여러 사이트에 동시에 로그인할 수 있는 시스템을 말한다. 한 번만 만들어 두면 새로운 사이트에 가서도 회원 가입 없이 서비스를 이용할 수 있다. 국내에서도 마이아이디 등이 오픈 아이디 서비스를 시작했지만 아직 큰 인기는 끌지 못하고 있다. 온라인 광고 역시 큰 변화를 맞게 될 전망이다. CPM(Cost per iMparession, 정액제) 방식 광고가 여전히 대세를 이루는 가운데 CPC(Cost per Click, 클릭당 과금) 방식이 틈새 시장을 뚫을 것이고 VRM(Visitor Relationship Management, 방문자 관계 관리) 방식의 실험이나 다른 형태의 타깃팅 광고 역시도 활발해 질 것이다. 다만 개인 정보보호 이슈가 걸림돌이 될 것으로 보인다. 온라인 비디오는 생방송과 모바일 등을 포함, 유비쿼터스 환경으로 옮겨갈 것이다. 언제 어디서나 인터넷에 접속해 비디오를 재생할 수 있게 된다는 이야기다. 아이폰이 선도적인 역할을 맡게 될 것이다. | |||||||||
| 최초입력 : 2007-12-27 12:55:25 최종수정 : 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||




|
o IT 조사 업체인 가트너는 IT 엑스포 심포지엄(ITxpo Symposium)에서 10대 혁신 기
술(Disruptive Technology) 선정 (2008.4.8)
- 동 기술은 향후 5년간 IT 환경을 혁신적으로 변경시킬 기술로 전망
o 2007년에 전망한 10대 혁신 기술과 비교해보면, 5개 기술(멀티코어 프로세서, 사용
자 인터페이스, 소셜 소프트웨어, 시멘틱, 웹 매쉬업)은 여전히 혁신적인 기술로 전
망되고 있음
- 그러나, 나머지 5개 기술 (웹 플랫폼, 테라 아키텍처, 그린 IT, 네트워크 가상세계,
비디오)은 신규 혁신 기술로 대체됨
o 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅, 상황인식 컴퓨팅, 증강 현실, 가상화, 클라우드 컴퓨팅 등이 신
규로 추가되어 향후 5년간 중요한 기술로 성장할 것으로 기대
|
매쉬업에 대해 알려주세요.seri_q 2007.07.26 00:00 |
답변 4 조회 808 |
|---|
MASH UP2007.07.26 00:00 |
|
|---|
이 지식은 삼성경제연구소에서 공유해주셨습니다.
매쉬업2007.07.26 00:00 |
|
|---|
이 지식은 삼성경제연구소에서 공유해주셨습니다.
| 수개월 내 시맨틱 웹의 엄청난 성장과 마주할 것 조광현 기자 ( ZDNet Korea ) 2007/02/14 |
|