< 노무현 대통령님의 유서 전문 >이라고 합니다.
언론사에서 발표한 것과는 차이가 있는 것 같아 올립니다.

물론 유서가 조작되었는지 조작되지 않았는지도 매우 중요한 부분이지만
보다 더 중요한 것은 유서가 던지는 메시지입니다.

노무현 대통령이 죽음을 선택하면서까지
우리에게 던질려고 했던 메시지가 무엇인지를 진정으로 깨달아야 합니다.

그리고 살아남은 우리들이 그에 대해서
진정으로 책임져야 할 일이 무엇인지
정확하게 스스로 질문하고 그 답을 찾는 것이 될 것입니다.
그리고 그러한 답을 가지고 우리의 남은 인생을 값지게 살아야 할 것입니다.

그것이 바로 이순간 우리가 해야할 가장 중요한 일이라고 생각합니다.
또한 그 분의 죽음을 헛되지 않게 만드는 일이기도 할 것입니다.

삼가 고인의 명복을 빕니다.

--------------------------------------------------------

사는 것이 힘들고 감옥같다.
나름대로 국정을 위해 열정을 다했는데
국정이 잘못됐다고 비판받아 정말 괴로웠다.

지금 마치 나를 국정을 잘못 운영한 것처럼 비판하고
지인들에게 돈을 갈취하고, 부정부패를
한 것처럼 비춰지고, 가족, 동료, 지인들까지 감옥에서 외로운 생활을
하게 하고 있어 외롭고 답답하다.

아들 딸과 지지자들에게도 정말
미안하다. 퇴임후 농촌 마을에 돌아와 여생을 보내려고 했는데 잘 되지
않아 참으로 유감이다.

돈 문제에 대한 비판이 나오지만 이 부분은 깨끗했다.
나름대로 깨끗한 대통령이라고 자부했는데 나에 대한 평가는
먼 훗날 역사가 밝혀줄 것이다.

너무 많은 사람들에게 신세를 졌다 나로 말미암아 여러 사람이 받은 고통이 너무 크다.
앞으로 받을 고통도 헤아릴 수가 없다. 여생도 남에게 짐이 될 일 밖에 없다.
건강이 좋지 않아서 아무 것도 할 수가 없다. 책을 읽을 수도 글을 쓸 수도 없다.

너무 슬퍼하지 마라. 삶과 죽음이 모두 자연의 한 조각 아니겠는가?
미안해 하지 마라. 누구도 원망하지 마라.
운명이다. 화장해라. 그리고 집 가까운 곳에 아주 작은 비석 하나만 남겨라
오래된 생각이다.

Posted by cykaneys

10 Things to Be Clear About Before You Start a Company

Written by Bernard Lunn / May 6, 2009 9:45 PM / 14 Comments

« Prior Post

 

This post is part of our ReadWriteStart channel, which is dedicated to profiling startups and entrepreneurs. The channel is sponsored by Microsoft BizSpark. To sign up for BizSpark, click here.

1. Is this your first venture?
2. Are you really an entrepreneur?
3. Does your venture involve something you understand really well?
4. Can your mother understand the value proposition?
5. Can you see the right wave?
6. What does your startup want to be when it grows up?
7. Starting a company is hard and uncertain.
8. Get a partner or fly solo?
9. Would you refuse a well-paying job to do this?
10. Can you raise appropriate financing?

1. Is This Your First Venture?

If you have already created and sold a venture, and you and your investors made lots of money, and you now have another good idea, call one of the investors over for coffee. Tell him or her about the idea, and decide how much of the company you would give them for a couple of million dollars. And skip item #2 below. But you may still find the remaining checklist valuable. Lots of second ventures fail, hubris being the primary culprit.

If your first venture was a failure, it might be worth evaluating honestly whether you want to do it again. Yes, you hear all the inspiring stories of folks who try and try again and fail many times before succeeding. You don't tend to hear the stories of those who try and try again but never succeed.

In other words, are you an entrepreneur? Really.

2. Are You Really an Entrepreneur?

A lot of checklists out there help you think about this. Our next chapter has a checklist about it. But ultimately, it is a gut check. There are two times when you need to be more than usually clear-eyed about this:

·         During the late stage of a boom, when it all looks so simple. It is not. If you start at this stage, you may raise money, but the next down cycle will test you severely. Are you really ready for this? Or do you think the boom cycle will last forever? See item #7 on this checklist, "Starting a company is hard and uncertain."

·         In hard times when you don't have a job. This forced entrepreneurship is happening right now. It sure beats pounding away at a fruitless job search. And even a failed venture looks better on your resume than a blank space. See item #9 on this checklist, "Would you refuse a well-paying job to do this?" If your honest answer is no, be clear-eyed about this. Treat this period as a learning experience and a resume-filler. You may get lucky and things take off and you get to reject the offer of that job you now want so badly. But don't count on Lady Luck; she is a fickle dame!

3. Does Your Venture Involve Something You Understand Really Well?

Can you answer any question from anybody, without notes? Do other people ask for your opinion on this subject? People talk a lot about passion. Yes, you need to care, but understanding, knowledge, and expertise carry you through the days when your passion is flagging.

4. Can Your Mother Understand the Value Proposition?

No, really. She will certainly want you to succeed, but you don't just want, "Yes, sweetheart, that sounds great. I have total confidence in you." Can she really understand it? Can she explain your venture to her friends? This test will help you avoid the bubble thinking that happens when everybody in one's network thinks that x, y, or z is the latest hot trend. Make sure you don't miss the common-sense, mainstream point of view.

5. Can You See the Right Wave?

A venture needs a wave to succeed. The odds against a startup succeeding are enormous. You need to "find the trend that is your friend," so that you can compete against entrenched incumbents. This may seem to conflict with item #3, which is all about timeless common sense. But the two can co-exist. One example of a trend is the movement from offline to online advertising. But you still have to explain to your mother how you will get attention from your audience at a low enough price and sell advertising inexpensively enough to make a profit.

There are the big monster waves. And there are the smaller waves. The big monsters are obvious: there are very few of them, and everyone is already riding them. Find the smaller waves within the bigger waves.

Can you, in 30 seconds, describe both the big and small wave you are riding?

6. What Does Your Startup Want to Be When It Grows Up?

Do you want a lifestyle business? Or a quick flip that you can sell in two years? Or do you want to build a massive public company and have your picture on the front cover of Fortune? Or perhaps something in between?

Be honest with yourself and be honest with your investors and partners.

Envision what success looks like to you. Are you working four-hour weeks, while your employees or website bring in enough to fund your fun-filled lifestyle? Have you just closed a deal to sell your venture to XYZ MegaCorp for a lot of cash and are thinking, "Thanks, suckers"? Are you the CEO addressing the board of a public company of which you are the largest shareholder, and you are facing existential threats that require tough decisions that, if executed wrong, could ruin everything you have spent a decade or more building... and loving every minute of it?

7. Starting a Company Is Hard and Uncertain

The failure rate for self-financed ventures is 90%. Do you like those odds? Venture-funded companies fail at a rate of 33%. So there is reason to celebrate VC financing. But the odds of getting VC financing are very low for first-time entrepreneurs. So, the odds starting off are really, really bad. Playing roulette in Vegas may be more lucrative.

Of the companies that make it, most have gone through stomach-churning, crazy-stressful times for much, much longer than anybody would think reasonable. Don't believe the cashed-out entrepreneur who makes it sound easy. He or she has simply forgotten!

8. Get a Partner or Fly Solo?

There is no right or wrong answer here. It depends on you and what type of entrepreneur you are. A partnership means 50/50, equal. Not 49/51. Not, "Here is 10% for making x, y, or z happen." Or do you want two partners, splitting the equity three ways?

Including a buy/sell clause in your partnership agreement is a wise precaution. People change. Their needs and motivations change. You might be the one who wants to get out of the partnership and move on. Or you might be the one who buys out your partner. Either should be possible, and the terms should be mutual.

9. Would You Refuse a Well-Paying Job to Do This?

Really? How high would the salary have to be before you say no?

10. Can You Raise Enough Financing?

The failure rate for self-financed ventures is 90% (remember item #7?). You may not need much money. "Enough" is based on what kind of startup you want to be (see item #6).

One last point: do you know at least one investor fairly well who has that kind of money and who invests in your type of venture? Or do you know somebody really, really well who knows one of those investors really, really well? If not, the odds just got a lot worse.

Determination, smarts, and hard work can beat lousy odds. But calculating your odds before you start is smart.

Posted by cykaneys

Mathematica Founder Gives Wolfram Alpha Preview

Looking for a "smarter" search engine? Mathematica founder Stephen Wolfram made an appearance at Harvard on Tuesday to provide more details on Wolfram Alpha, an upcoming search engine that aims to more thoroughly answer Web users' questions rather than just serve up existing data.

"The goal is to find a way to make the systematic knowledge that we've accumulated computable," Wolfram said at Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet & Society. "The state of technology and the Web … finally made this project not completely crazy."

Wolfram first announced plans for the search engine in March. It is scheduled to go live next month at www.wolframalpha.com.

How will Wolfram Alpha differ from Google, Yahoo, or MSN Live?

Wolfram went through a variety of possible search results. Typing in "Lexington, Mass.", for example, will produce the city's population, nearby cities, or a weather report. Want to know what the weather was like in Lexington for the past 10 years? Wolfram Alpha knows that too.

How about "330 grams of gold" – that search will reveal its value or heat capacity. Type in a chemical, meanwhile, and Wolfram Alpha will produce its components or how you can make it yourself.

On the public health front, type in "LDL 180" and it will dive into public health information to tell you that your LDL level is in the 99th percentile for the population. Dig a little deeper to tell it you are a 40-year-old male, and Wolfram Alpha will put you in the 92nd percentile.

What about "MSFT and Sun"?

"Sun might mean the thing in the sky, but because it's next to something that's a stock" it's going to assume that Sun means Sun Microsystems and produce comparisons between the two companies, Wolfram said.

How does it work? Wolfram pointed to four main components that drive the Wolfram Alpha search engine: data curation, internal algorithm and computation, linguistic understanding, and automated presentation.

"Wolfram Alpha has trillions of pieces of curated data," Wolfram said. "We're getting data from both free data and licensed data – some of it is very static. A lot is data from feeds that come into our system, and we're running through this partially automated, partially human process, correlating data and verifying data. It's set up so it's organized and clean and computable."

Before you envision a robot uprising, Wolfram acknowledges that the human component is necessary for Wolfram Alpha to work.

"A lot can be done automatically, but at some point you need a human domain expert and we're lucky enough that we've got that," he said.

In terms of computations, "what we're trying to do there is take all methods, models, equations, from all different areas and implement them in the Mathematica code that lies inside Wolfram Alpha so we can actually do computations about all sorts of things."

Wolfram insisted that the site is not just for brainiacs trying to solve complex mathematical equations.

"The goal is to make expert-level knowledge accessible and available to anybody, anywhere, anytime," he said. If you present information in an easy-to-understand format, it's useful to everyone.

The site will even crunch data on pop culture.

"Popular culture information is actually much more shallowly computable than all these scientific and engineering type questions," Wolfram said. "We can find out who is related to whom, how tall people are."

He acknowledged that there can be "linguistic horrors" when typing in titles of books and music because a lot of names clash with other concepts. For that, Wolfram Alpha will rely on the Wikipedia popularity index to determine the book, movie, or celebrity for which someone might be looking.

The main site will be completely free, he said, though there will be a subscription-based service for people who might want to upload their own data.

"We will have corporate sponsors who will have things on the site," he said. "In fact, just the ones for launch are getting lined up for launch now."

He is still trying to figure out the best way to merge corporate data and query results in terms of advertising, Wolfram said.


<다른 주목받는 검색엔진>

검색 2.0 엔진임을 표방하는 큐브(http://qube.qelix.com/v2/index.htm)의 에브라임 에지가 최근 리드라이트웹(http://www.readwriteweb.com/)에 기고한 글에서 검색 2.0과 전통적인 구세대 검색 엔진을 비교했다. 에지는 구글이나 야후, MSN, 애스크 등 기존 검색 엔진들이 텍스트 비교와 링크 분석 등의 전통적인 방식을 쓰고 있는 반면, 검색 2.0 엔진들은 제 3세대 엔진이라고 밝히고 있다.
에지는 제 3세대 검색 엔진으로 스위키와 롤료, 클러스티, 윙크, 렉세의 다섯 가지 예를 들었다. 스위키(Swicki, http://swicki.eurekster.com/)는 커뮤니티에 기반한 검색 엔진으로, 사용자마다 특별히 관심 있는 분야에 초점을 맞춘 전문 검색을 제공하는데 중점을 두고 있다. 롤료(Rollyo, http://rollyo.com/) 역시 스위키와 유사하게 커뮤니티 전문 검색을 표방한다. 롤료는 자기만의 개인화된 검색 엔진을 블로그처럼 공개할 수 있도록 되어 있는 점이 특징이다. 피츠버그의 카네기 멜론 대학교에서 시작된 기업인 클러스티(Clusty, http://clusty.com/)는 문서 군집화라는 기술을 이용하여 비슷한 검색 결과를 하나로 묶어서 보여주는 검색 엔진이다.  간단한 키워드 검색에 비해 한 단계의 지능적인 단계를 더 거쳐야 하며, 비슷한 유사 문서나 개념이 하나로 묶는 과정의 정확도가 생명이다. 예를 들어 “애플”이라는 검색어에 대해 과일 “사과”와 관련된 검색 결과와 애플 컴퓨터 회사와 관련된 검색 결과를 미리 처리한 뒤 사용자에게 나누어 보여주는 방식이다. 윙크(Wink, http://www.wink.com/)는 요즘 각종 사이트에서 인기 있는 태깅(tagging) 기능을 첨가한 검색 엔진이다. 마음에 드는 검색 결과에 “최고”라는 태그를 붙이거나, 상업성 광고 내용에 “스팸”이라는 태그를 붙일 수 있다. 다른 사용자는 기존 사용자들이 자발적으로 붙여 놓은 태그를 이용해 질적으로 향상된 검색 결과를 대할 수 있다. 따라서 이론적으로 윙크의 검색 결과는 항상 진화하는 상태에 놓이게 된다. 렉세(Lexxe, http://www.lexxe.com/)는 전산언어학적인 기술을 이용하여 어떤 질문에 대한 답을 바로 내놓는 질의응답형 검색 엔진이다. 일반 검색 엔진이 관련 문서를 순서대로 보여주는데 그친다면, 렉세는 사용자의 질의 의도를 파악하고 그에 맞는 답을 내놓는데 목적을 둔다. 예를 들면 “미국 43대 대통령은?”이라는 질문에 대해 기존 검색 엔진은 조지 부시 대통령에 대한 문서를 나열하는데 반하여, 렉세는 “조지 부시”라고 답을 바로 알려준다.



 

Posted by cykaneys